Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-06 09:38:53


I think these results are good enough provided that you can show that some
significant optimizations are available. People can always fall back on raw
streams for time-critical I/O.

-Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Samuel Krempp" <krempp_at_[hidden]>
Results were :

. compiled with optimisation (-O) :
printf time : 0m 0.732s
ostream time : 0m 1.659s, = 2.267 * printf

stored format time : 0m 3.541s, = 2.135 * stream
format time : 0m 6.434s, = 3.879 * stream
func_format time : 0m 9.998s, = 6.028 * stream

. compiled with debug (-g) :
printf time : 0m 0.742s
ostream time : 0m 2.399s, = 3.231 * printf

stored format time : 0m 9.653s, = 4.024 * stream
format time : 0m19.305s, = 8.049 * stream
func_format time : 0m26.525s, = 11.059 * stream

How do those results sound ? good enough, or not quite ?


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk