Re: [boost] Re: Boost.Build - #include <> vs. ""

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-14 13:38:58

----- Original Message -----
From: <williamkempf_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>

> please send a pointer to the latest with
> instructions.
>
> Just using the Jamfiles from Boost.Threads (CVS branch "thread-
> initial").  I think you're right about it being a path thing.  A
> little more experimentation has shown that the choice of "" and <>
> really don't make a difference (I thought it did because I tested
> changing one #include, which happened to be for timeconv.inl, a file
> local to the source files).  The headers in /boost/thread can be
> modified and this won't trigger a rebuild of source files that
> include them.  This did work for me in the past, but I can't tell you
> precisely when the behavior changed.

Please send me /precise/ instructions for reproducing the problem,
e.g. "build xxx with the following command-line, then touch yyy.hpp, and
rebuild with the same command-line"

-Dave