From: boost (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-23 01:13:51
> Perhaps we have a misunderstanding.
> My intent was to say that the best thing to have
> is _just_ a list of constants. Not functions returning
> constants, or templates, or some other arcane C++
o.k., then I agree.
If I would have problems with accuracy from converting
the constants, I wouldn't trust compiler/library supplied values
and generate my own number library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk