Re: [boost] review requiest: config_06.zip

From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-12 14:12:42

John Maddock wrote:

> >Why the word "SYSTEM" in "BOOST_SYSTEM_HAS_STDINT_H"? It seems that this
> >is a property of the C standard library implementation, not the "system".
> >Perhaps there's some confusion here because Unix systems tend to include C
> 
> >standard library implementations, so on Unix this is part of the "system".
> 
> Good question, that's the way it is at present - changing it means changing
> boost code, although it's just a search and replace right?

I think I'm guilty for that one; and it was one of the first "HAS"
macros present in boost.  Feel free to remove the "SYSTEM" part
throughout.

Jens Maurer