Re: [boost] Technical session at the October C++ meeting?

From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-16 13:48:44

Beman Dawes wrote:
> * What libraries would the Boost membership like to see submitted?

Is Boost.Random too domain-specific to consider it?
(Note: It's my submission, so I'm biased.)

Are people actually using it?  Are they interesting in getting
it standardized?

There's "rand" in the C library, and I believe Boost.Random
defines a nice C++-style framework for random numbers, without
required global data (bad for threading, at least).

Jens Maurer