Re: [boost] Re: Technical session at the October C++ meeting?

From: Ross Smith (ross.s_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-16 16:25:42

Peter Dimov wrote:
> 
> Things that I feel are worth submitting, in no particular order:
> 
> * a vector that has no overhead compared to new[], uses realloc() wherever
> possible, and uses memcpy() instead of copy/destroy when not instructed
> otherwise, along with a paper that explains why the std::vector current
> specification prevents this. Bonus point: a vector that is as efficient as a
> C99 VLA.

Wait a few days and I should have my policy-based array ready to submit.

-- 
Ross Smith <ross.s_at_[hidden]> The Internet Group, Auckland, New Zealand
========================================================================
"Unix has always lurked provocatively in the background of the operating
system wars, like the Russian Army."                  -- Neal Stephenson