Date: 2001-08-20 02:16:07
17 Aug 2001 18:50:35 +0400 Beman Dawes wrote:
>meet common needs without extensive parameterization. Someday a highly
>configurable smart pointer may be invented that is also very easy to use
If the current variant will be standardized, whether it begins an obstacle
for improvements? Whether will leave it an opportunity for further
optimization of smart_ptr<>, for example, specializations for an intrusive
reference counting, allocation of non-intrusive reference counter through
boost::pool and so on?
Current size fits many, but not all.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk