Date: 2001-08-20 19:30:43
--- In boost_at_y..., John Max Skaller <skaller_at_m...> wrote:
> williamkempf_at_h... wrote:
> Try again. If this were a new programming language,
> and you were designing a brand new library for it, you would not
> need TLS or thread adoption. So it would be nice to have two
> interfaces: one for brand new threading applications,
> the 'pure' boost interface, and an extension which also
> supports integration with exitsing code.
TLS can simply be ignored in this case. As for "adoption"... if your
language interfaces with libraries from other languages then you're
going to need to "adopt" native threads created by other people.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk