From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-21 12:05:29
> > From: "William Kempf" <williamkempf_at_h...>
> > > So, what you really want is not an atomic_t type, but a ref_count
> > Yes, exactly. When I looked at the atomic_t documentation I was
> left with
> > the impression that this is exactly the type I need for a reference
> > (It had win32 Interlocked* semantics, AFAICS.) Apparently I
> The Win32 Interlocked* semantics are not enough to insure a proper
> ref-counting implementation... especially when you talk portably.
> Alexander tried to point this out with the links he posted. The fact
> that InterlockedIncrement and InterlockedDecrement are enough on IA32
> is just a (un)happy coincidence. Ref-counting is a higher level
> concept than an atomic integer.
Right. So the right for thing boost::shared_ptr to do when
boost::thread is accepted is to implement its own optional
thread-safe counter, but as detail, not a public interface.
Then at some point, if we wish, we can publish an interface
in the threads library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk