|
Boost : |
From: flameframe_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-08-24 09:21:32
The following program fails to compile.
#include <boost/tuple/tuple.hpp>
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
const boost::tuple<int> test;
boost::get<0>(test);
return 0;
}
MSVC6.5 claims to line 'boost::get<0>(test)'
.. : error C2667: 'get' : none of 2 overload have a best conversion
.. : error C2668: 'get' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
Though program compiles without 'const'. Is it inappropriate here?
Regards,
Vitalij.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk