Re: [boost] stride_iterator_policy

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-27 10:41:53

On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Kresimir Fresl wrote:
fresl>
fresl> AFAIK, in the latest version of iterator_policies increment() is not
fresl> a static member function; I think that stride can therefore be a
fresl> member of stride_iterator_policy.

At one point the default_iterator_policies increment function was static,
but that was not meant to imply that other policy classes had to make
their functions static. Also, the reason why the static was removed was
just to avoid some compiler bugs.

Cheers,
Jeremy

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jeremy Siek                          http://php.indiana.edu/~jsiek/
 Ph.D. Student, Indiana Univ. B'ton   email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)   office phone: [phone]
----------------------------------------------------------------------