Re: [boost] Re: numeric/ublas & gcc 3.0

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-27 15:53:45

Joerg,

If you are using gcc under Windows I can give you instructions to build
yourself a gcc-3.0.1 installation. Much better!

-Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: <walter_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:32 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: numeric/ublas & gcc 3.0

--- In boost_at_y... <mailto:boost_at_y..., Kresimir Fresl < fresl_at_g...
<mailto:fresl_at_g>> wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> two hours ago I wrote:
>
> > I am using gcc 3.0. Attempt to compile 'test11.cpp'
> > (with -USE_GCC) results in more than a thousand lines of
> > error messages and warnings.
> >
> > Lots of them are caused by missing typenames
> > in declarations of nested types.
> >
> > Furthermore, in exception.h:
> [...]
>
> And, of course, there were also some typos etc.
>
> > With all typenames added (3 hours work) and with throw specifiers,
> > test11.cpp can be compiled.
>
> And all test2*.cpp and test3*.cpp.

That's fine ;-)

> I attached the diff files. Maybe they can be useful.

Thanks a lot. I incorporated most of your changes and compiled with
GCC 2.95.2. I hope, that we do not have to differentiate between
2.95.2 and 3.0. We'll check the new version into CVS ASAP.

Regards

Joerg

Info: http://www.boost.org  Unsubscribe:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/