Re: [boost] Re: numeric/ublas & gcc 3.0

From: Kresimir Fresl (fresl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-28 06:36:56

On Monday 27 August 2001 20:32, walter_at_[hidden] wrote:

> Kresimir Fresl wrote:

> > I attached the diff files. Maybe they can be useful.

> Thanks a lot. I incorporated most of your changes and compiled with
> GCC 2.95.2. I hope, that we do not have to differentiate between
> 2.95.2 and 3.0. We'll check the new version into CVS ASAP.

Please note that I hacked the templated types in declarations 
of `prec_prod' in matrix_et.h (which were obviously result of 
bad cut&paste) just to make tests compile; it's possible 
that that's not what you intended. 

There's one more thing which I noticed in my examples: 

    matrix.h should include vector.h. 

Otherwise, if one uses only matrix.h (without previous inclusion
of vector.h), `forward' and `backward' remain undefined.

BTW, do you plan to add const versions of functions
matrix<>::row(), matrix<>::column() and matrix<>::project() 
(which probably means introduction of corresponding
types const_matrix_row<> etc.) ? 

Sincerely,

fres