From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-29 13:05:49
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Maddock" <John_Maddock_at_[hidden]>
To: "boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:29 AM
Subject: [boost] mobile/embedded boost
> Up until now, I have had the impression that boost wasn't interested in
> supporting platforms/compilers with no exception handling support, however
> I've had a couple of queries from regex users about building on WinCE
> (where I am led to understand that the compiler has no exception support).
> I wonder what do boost folks feel about these platforms - on the one hand
> one could argue that exception handling is far more useful on these mobile
> platforms than on desktop ones (which almost never run out of resources),
> and that therefore it's a compiler problem.
> On the other hand these are
> popular platforms, and some of boost is very appropriate here (static
> asserts, type traits based optimizations, smart_ptr etc).
> I'm not
> suggesting that the graph lib would be appropriate for say a toaster, or
> that regex might be used in a washing machine :-)
Why not? I can see it.
> but many mobile
> platforms now have multi-megabyte memories and could support even the
> larger boost libs.
> The main problem of course, is what does one do if the lib would normally
> throw an exception, but exceptions aren't available? In some cases an
> assert might be appropriate, but that's not universally true.
Trying to weave "traditional" error-handling into code which now assumes
exceptions are available would kill it. I think the best you can do is to
hope that the platform has a function you can call to deal with resource
depletion, and wrap all your throws in some bottleneck routine that can be
configured for the platform.
> I don't have any answers here - or enough experience in this area to begin
> to develop an informed opinion - but I hope that some of you guys will.
1. I did embedded development with G++.
2. I think Metrowerks is strong in this area as well
3. Are we sure that VC7 for WinCE won't support EH?
Oh, that's 3.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk