[boost] Two compressed_pair/type_traits issues

From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-30 06:00:21

>1. Someone just pointed out to me that the compressed_pair docs mention
the
>"empty member optimization". Shouldn't that be "empty base optimization",
>instead?

Yes.

>I'm guessing that Howard's fix below was not for a compiler bug, but a
>library bug after all? In any case could it hurt to take off the #ifdef
>guards?

Probably not - I've changed that in the cvs and added a test case to the
test file.

- John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/