Re: [boost] functional.hpp and mem_fun.hpp (was [Review] bind)

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-30 07:28:22

From: "John Maddock" <John_Maddock_at_[hidden]>
> I guess one possible solution would be to have:
>
> call_traits<auto_ptr<T> >::param_type
>
> evaluate as a non-const ref:
>
> auto_ptr<T>&

This fails for temporaries of type auto_ptr<T>, doesn't it?

> Would that keep everyone happy, and allow some progress to be made?  Mark?
> Peter?

As far as mem_fun.hpp is concerned, I'll simply rename it to mem_fn.hpp.
This debate has exceeded its quota. ;-)

--
Peter Dimov
Multi Media Ltd.