Re: [boost] Re: Review: Boost.Threads

From: Gustavo Guerra (gustavobt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-02 09:57:22

Nevermind, I must have been still sleeping when I wrote that

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <williamkempf_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 11:39 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Review: Boost.Threads

> --- In boost_at_y..., "Gustavo Guerra" <gustavobt_at_m...> wrote:
> > > > There's no mention of thread_resource_error in the docs. Why
> > > doesn't both
> > > > the exception classes have a 'what' member function?
> > >
> > > I goofed with the docs for thread_resource_error and will add it 
> this
> > > weekend, hopefully.  Both exception classes do have 'what' member
> > > functions, documented indirectly in the synopsis which shows they
> > > both derive from std::runtime_error.  I probably should explicitly
> > > document this, though.
> > >
> > 
> > What I meant is why don't they have their own what member, 
> different from
> > std::runtime_error.
> 
> What is a virtual, so I don't follow what you mean by "have their own 
> what member".  If you mean the text returned is different, this is 
> the case.
> 
> Bill Kempf
>