Date: 2001-09-05 07:40:02
--- In boost_at_y..., "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_r...> wrote:
> Regarding my previous assertions that tuple and cons need to go in
> namespace: when I made that assertion it wasn't clear to me that
> like get<> and set<>, which require explicitly-specified template
> are immune to argument-dependent lookup.
Just when I thought it was all clear!
Thanks for pointing that out.
> The upshot is that they either need
> to be explicitly qualified or one needs to introduce a
> that they may be found. I am not sure whether that changes the story
> which namespaces tuple and cons must be located in. I'm hoping that
> will do the analyis, and will either show that my concerns are
> foundation or will propose a solution that takes them into account.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk