From: Philip Nash (philip.nash_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-06 07:37:46
> >Perhaps now is the time for someone, or some people, to take a look at
> >organisation of boost as a whole. Nothing too major, but just a sensible
> >grouping of libraries, maybe in a hierarchical fashion ...
> One very simple way to do this, without impacting anything else,
> is simply reorganize the presentation of libraries on
> See the attached for a first cut.
> A final version would include a little table-of-contents at the
> and might also still include the purely alphabetic list in a separate
> Comments? Does this address enough of the concerns to make it
> worth doing?
Yes, very nice. Simple but effective - always a good sign :-)
I don't think you need much else, at least not right now. Of course as the
number of libraries grows still bigger we may need to review things further
down the line.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk