Boost logo

Boost :

From: rwgk_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-09-06 14:09:22

Uh... the answer is actually in the documentation:
  Regarding the constructors there was an important design tradeoff...
Sorry for the noise.

--- In boost_at_y..., rwgk_at_y... wrote:
> The template class boost:array (array.hpp) does not
> include constructors. However, I believe that it would
> be useful to provide a constructor like:
> array(const T& value) { assign(value); }
> Then we would also need a default constructor:
> array() {}
> Are there possible side-effects when adding these
> constructors that I do not know about? If not, could
> these be added?
> Thanks!
> Ralf

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at