From: Gennadiy E. Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-07 12:40:56
--- In boost_at_y..., Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_a...> wrote:
> Posting a long series of compiler workarounds as separate messages
> me to be a poor use of mailing list bandwidth.
> At the very least, they should be batched into a smaller number of
> Beyond that, several of the proposed fixes seem to spread compiler
> checking out into individual library files. The whole point of
> (and the replacement config system just reviewed) is to centralize
> configuration information in one easy to maintain location.
I agree with you. But Can you propose how to do this?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk