From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-07 13:45:19
Darin Adler wrote:
> Wouldn't this be better handled by defining either BOOST_NO_INT64_T or
> BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T for the SunPro compiler in config.hpp instead of
> making the change here?
I've changed boost/config.hpp so that BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T is
defined. The error messages ("enum too wide") suggest that this is
the proper fix.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk