From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-09 07:04:19
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> The rationale is sound, but the result does not conform to your
> specification. The documentation doesn't state anywhere that a method
> asserts; it says that the method throws on error.
... and sometimes it doesn't even mention that the method may throw, as in
condition::condition. This may be covered in a 'general' section that I
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk