Boost logo

Boost :

From: William Kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-17 08:59:45

From: "Scott McCaskill" <scott_at_[hidden]>
>>--- In boost_at_y..., Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_g...> wrote:
>> > - xtime.hpp uses "boost/stdint.h", which is deprecated
>> >and fails with como on my Linux box. Use "boost/cstdint.hpp"
>> >instead (need to fix uintXX_t usage in the code as well).
>>I don't understand the part in parens above. xtime.hpp uses int_fastXX_t
>>types but not uintXX_t types, and I don't know of anything in the usage
?> needs fixed.
>Not sure if this is what the OP was talking about, but gcc produces
>signed/unsigned warnings because xtime::sec and xtime::nsec are >signed.
>there any reason why they should not be unsigned? I changed these
> >variables
>to be unsigned types in my local copy to eliminate the warnings.

Yes, there's a reason for them being signed. It allows you to have dates
prior to the epoch. Where do signed/unsigned warnings occur? My compiler,
even at level 4, doesn't indicate any such problems.

Bill Kempf

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at