Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-22 12:06:29

From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> At 10:53 AM 9/22/2001, Peter Dimov wrote:
> >While looking into Bind regression failures I discovered that Intel C++
> >5.0.1/Linux in strict mode fails to compile Boost.Test (segmentation
> >violation.)
> >
> >This is not good, is it? It means that any library that uses Boost.Test
> >will report a bogus failure.
> Could you be a bit more specific about that? Are you saying the compiler
> itself seg faults? What file was being compiled?

This is the relevant part of linux.log.gz:

*** libs/test/example/test_tools_example.cpp ***

** Intel C++ 5.0.1 Build 010730D0 (strict mode)
icc -Xc -Kc++eh -we70 -tpp6 -xi -mp -o
boosttmp.exe -I/home/jmaurer/Boost/boost.write/status/..
icc: error: Fatal error in /opt/intel/compiler50/ia32/bin/mcpcom, terminated
by segmentation violation
compilation aborted for
le.cpp (code 1)
Return code: 256

Peter Dimov
Multi Media Ltd.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at