From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-27 16:32:55
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> > Should the topic come up in the LWG, I would definitely argue strongly
> > against it.
> Sorry; but, against "having a compiler_config header" or against
> "considering optional features a bad idea"?
Against having a compiler_config header and thus officially
accepting and trying to deal with less-capable implementations on
the standard level.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk