From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-28 06:09:00
>Ist this a known problem about boost_1_24_0 ?
I don't really understand those errors - the code around there hasn't
changed in a while - and the latest regression tests on solaris seem to be
passing OK. Is there any chance that this is some kind of setup issue?
Alternatively is this a new problem introduced in the latest sunpro patches
(I think Jens is testing with C++ 5.2)? If the latter is the case, does
moving the offending function definitions class-inline solve the problem?
- John Maddock
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk