From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-28 06:17:27
>Would it be possible to add something like
>BOOST_NO_COVARIANT_RETURN_TYPES to detect missing support for section
>10.3.5 of the standard?
Are they used anywhere in boost? There's no problem adding more macros,
but I guess we don't really want macros that are unused.
- John Maddock
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk