Date: 2001-09-29 06:25:06
> The code below seems like it must treat a conversion from A to B
> way as a conversion from B to A (since the expression true ? : A
() : B() has
> the same type as true ? : B() : A()). Is that intended?
The intention is to do the usual arithmetic conversions
as explained in clause 5 (5/9), to bring types A and B
to a common type.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk