From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-06 10:58:45
On Saturday, October 6, 2001, at 11:47 AM, Peter Dimov wrote:
> Don't get me wrong; I value the ability to not include <everything>.
> But why
> not simply add the overload to the standard, instead of trying to
> specify that
> void f(std::string const &);
> is different than
> when in fact the two are equivalent.
I would be behind such a proposal 110%! (that's 110 factorial ;-) )
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk