Re: Reaction to dlw_int.zip review

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-09 14:52:29

on 10/9/01 10:24 AM, David Abrahams at david.abrahams_at_[hidden] wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
>>> Also, although the future of these libraries is now partly in your hands, it
>>> would be best to minimize large changes between the review and the time that
>>> the code is first integrated into boost's CVS tree. Large enhancements
>>> (overflow checking is an example) ought to appear in a second revision, just
>>> to preserve revision history.
>> 
>> So now what?
> 
> Maybe something, maybe nothing. Use your best judgement. If it's practical,
> you could request that the revision which was accepted be checked in, followed
> by your latest version. Try to package things so that the effort of
> integrating your changes is not too great.

We could do it like you suggest, add the accepted version, quickly followed
by the latest.  I keep copies of the old versions.

-- 
Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT mac DOT com