Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennadiy E. Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-13 11:55:56


--- In boost_at_y..., John Maddock <John_Maddock_at_c...> wrote:
>
> >As far as I remember it was disscussed to add flag like
> >BOOST_SUNPRO_CC_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION
> >I do not see it.
> >
> >Also I recomend to add BOOST_BUGGY_INTEGRAL_CONSTANT_EXPRESSIONS
to
> >SunPro configuration.
>
> Yes, but I'm not sure that it's necessary any more - sunpro C++ 5.3
seems
> to have reasonably good partial specialisation support (enough that
> type_traits/call_traits/compressed pair all work in any case - I
haven't
> tested anything else yet. Integral constant members also seem to
work fine
> with this compiler version. So the problem is no longer so
important. BTW
> some patches to the code and config were necessary - see latest cvs
source.
I did not have a chance to work with update 2 yet, but with update 1
original type traits have a lot of failures. I was able to fix most
of it using Sun "special" partial specialization. That is why I
needed first flag (I will try to lokk what was changed in u.2). Also
as far as I remember U.2 still does not support any expression with
not-type tempalte agruments, that is why we need second flag (Again,
I will try to recheck it with u.2)

Gennadiy.

P.S. Coukd you please take a look on patches that I posted while ago
on type traits library. I was able to make all type_traits works
(excluding 241 error in transform traits and couple in other places)
There could be something usefull.

>
>
> - John Maddock
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk