From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-18 06:38:53
>We should probably now substitute BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T to
>BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG in some places where it guards tests with long
>long (in type traits for example)
It doesn't quite do it that way, but substitution done anyway.
- John Maddock
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk