From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-19 10:58:31
on 10/19/01 3:48 AM, Peter Dimov at pdimov_at_[hidden] wrote:
> I do know that the motivation for the self-reset is that std::auto_ptr
> supports it, but I would strongly suggest that we reconsider propagating the
> same mistake into shared_ptr.
I think that the best short term solution is to replace:
if (px == p) return;
assert(p == 0 || p != px); // no auto_ptr-style self-reset "feature"
I think an assert that catches the specific case that is legal with older
versions of shared_ptr and with auto_ptr is good, even though there are tons
of other kinds of misuse that it won't catch.
What do you think?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk