Re: [boost] Proposal about smart_ptr

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-21 11:19:14

From: "Greg Colvin" <gcolvin_at_[hidden]>
> > This 'compatibility' header will simply be a (possibly cleaned-up)
version
> > of the current code and will not make use of shared_count.
>
> This sounds like a clean way to arrange things.

By the way, is someone using BOOST_SMART_PTR_CONVERSION? Should we drop this
feature while we're at it? Any standard smart pointers will (hopefully) not
have a conversion operator, so it's not a good idea to write code that
relies on it.

--
Peter Dimov
Multi Media Ltd.