From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-24 14:57:18
> > BTW this applies to boost::semaphore as well. Now is the right time
> to take
> > it away since nobody uses it yet. :-)
> Absolutely agreed, and I'll be making the final decision before the
> next release.
In case that it's not clear, I'm strongly in favor of removing
boost::semaphore. We can always add it later if the demand for semaphores is
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk