Date: 2001-10-28 11:39:45
--- In boost_at_y..., mda_at_d... wrote:
> > Boost's proposals for new standard library
> > features for the TR faired well in general.
> not being familiar with the process, i'm wondering whether
> "proposal" here means "this particular thing in boost"
> or "something providing the goals met for example
> by this thing in boost".
> if the latter, i can understand why the boost threads library
> was brought up. if the former, i don't -- that library has
> to my knowledge yet to appear in a boost release, and has not
> completed the boost internal process, to the extent that
> has been formalized.
Boost.Threads was accepted into Boost and is part of the current
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk