Re: operators.hpp issue

From: helmut.zeisel_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-10-29 09:40:36

--- In boost_at_y..., "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_r...> wrote:
> Hi Helmut,
> 
> I want to make use of your contribution, but have been very busy 
with other
> things. I have a favor to ask: would you kindly integrate your 
changes with
> the contents of 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/dlw_oprs2.zip and
> send me the patch so that I have only one set of changes to review?

I merged

dlw_opers2.zip,
operators_test.zip,
operators_4.zip

and made the changes suggested in

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/message/16941

The result is in

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/big_int/operators_5.zip
 
> Please
> look at Daryle's work quickly

From a quick check I can say that the changes look reasonable
to me. Using the merged version,
operators_test and my big_int class work
on VC++ 6.0, cygwin/GCC 2.95.3, and Linux/GCC 3.0.1.

Daryle, please can you check whether I really
integrated your work correctly.
Maybe you could also check operators_test.cpp on your Mac.

> 
> If this is OK with you, I'll take a quick look over the resulting 
changes
> and integrate them this week.
> 

OK. As I said in 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/message/16922

if you would like to improve the language of my part
of the documentation, feel free to do so.

Helmut