From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-29 20:20:18
At 04:24 PM 10/29/2001, Anson Tsao wrote:
>Was the function library submitted to the LWG as well? Since the
>threading library is dependant on it.
Not yet. If the LWG rejects the function library, the interface would have
to be changed to pick up the argument some other way.
The current thread library is also using an xtime type which may end up
being just a placeholder. If we get a nice date/time library, it might
well replace xtime.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk