Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Zhang, Gary (Gary.Zhang_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-01 19:00:26

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Re: jam question"
Previous message: Paul A. Bristow: "RE: [boost] Re: FFT"
Next in thread: Darin Adler: "Re: [boost] RE: reference count for smart_ptr of NULL"
Reply: Darin Adler: "Re: [boost] RE: reference count for smart_ptr of NULL"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] RE: reference count for smart_ptr of NULL"

Can somebody tell me why the reference count is incremented
when shared_ptr is initialized by a null ( 0 ) pointer ?

Isn't it more logical for ref_count to remain 0 since
NULL pointer has no sharing value ?

Gary

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Re: jam question"
Previous message: Paul A. Bristow: "RE: [boost] Re: FFT"
Next in thread: Darin Adler: "Re: [boost] RE: reference count for smart_ptr of NULL"
Reply: Darin Adler: "Re: [boost] RE: reference count for smart_ptr of NULL"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] RE: reference count for smart_ptr of NULL"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk