RE: [boost] boost.timer

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-02 08:01:47

> Your comment that can even go to nanoseconds scared me though. Timers
> typically need a small memory footprint (to minimise destructive
> testing) whereas a general time-class of course will try to span large
> time intervals. I don't think both concepts are easy to merge.

That's why GDTL uses templates and let's the user gets to pick the time-space
tradeoffs.

Jeff