Boost logo

Boost :

From: Markus Schoepflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-07 15:14:50


--- In boost_at_y..., "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_r...> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Markus Schoepflin" <markus.schoepflin_at_g...>
>
> > Ok, got an answer from Boris.
> >
> > "Nope, it's [stl_user_config.h] not deprecated. Yes 4.5.1 will be
> > backwards compatible with 4.5."
>
>
> So much for my memory! So, where does that leave us?
>

1. There will be STLport version that are link compatible with
others. Should we make special arangements for this in the build
system? Or just ignore the whole issue and treat each
major/minor/bugfix/whatever release as a new version with it's own
directory name?

I prefer the latter for now. I don't know if it's worth the effort to
figure out which revisions are compatible.

2. Should the build system provide any support for enabling things
from stl_user_config.h? Currently it ignores most of the settings and
just deals with io streams mode and debug mode. Possible solutions
are:

a) Ignore it completely. (Not nice)
b) Support some major config switches. (As it is now. Perhaps we need
support for more?)
c) Support every config switch which affects link compatibility as a
feature. (Who is going to figure out what these switches are?)
d) The above plus the other config switches as free features.

The best would be option d) but probably b) will be sufficient...

Markus


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk