From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-12 13:02:45
on 11/12/01 9:57 AM, Peter Dimov at pdimov_at_[hidden] wrote:
> Compatibility? Currently Boost is in "release mode" by default (because it
> doesn't have a debug mode.) The rationale is (AFAIK) possible ODR problems.
Boost currently has some assertions in it now that use assert(). And those
are not in "release mode" by default. You haven't convinced me yet that
there's a need to deviate from the C standard's approach.
> How, and where, should we include the function name? Do you mean as a
> parameter to boost_error?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk