Date: 2001-11-13 17:45:59
--- In boost_at_y..., scleary_at_j... wrote:
> > Steve, what are your feelings on all this? Seeing as how you
> > singleton class already, do you feel you have the time to
> > these things into your design? Or would you rather I began work
on a more
> > general singleton from 'scratch'?
> My current singleton would look very different once I remove that
> restriction (by using an exception-neutral equivalent of
> We might just want to start from scratch.
What do you mean by "an exception-neutral equivalent of
boost::call_once"? Is this something Boost.Threads needs to look at?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk