From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-13 18:10:13
I think a single licence is highly desirable.
Surely for something as simple as this even the lawyers can agree?
It should provide 'no liability' and 'no other person claiming copyright'.
(As I understand the situation, if someone else claimed copyright,
they could claim money for infringing it and/or stop others using it).
Perhaps the corporation lawyers can produce something they like?
(And which we can accept).
Dr Paul A Bristow, hetp Chromatography
LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830
Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beman Dawes [mailto:bdawes_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 5:15 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Corporate legal department reaction to Boost license
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk