|
Boost : |
From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-21 22:30:46
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 09:07 pm, you wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Nice explanation, rationale, and comparison to libsigc++!
>
> Please add this to your docs. The C++ committee is very interested in both
> rationale for design decisions, and comparisons to other libraries. So
> even if it is just a copy of your raw message below, please to add it.
Will do. It'll be in the next version of the library, along with some design
documentation.
> I think I'm going to start encouraging Boost developers to add a (possibly
> empty) FAQ to docs right from the word go. That way there is a place to
> put answers to questions as they come up.
Perhaps this is something for the Wiki? It would be easy to "grow" FAQs
there, and then import it into the official documentation for releases.
Doug
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk