From: Hamish Mackenzie (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-27 11:35:17
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 15:53, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> As I said above, boost::mpl DOES have 'value_list' template, so one can
Sory I should have read more carefully.
> typedef mpl::value_list<1,7,5,2,4,8,9,2,0,3,9,1> values;
I think you must have left out some have you left out the int_t<N>s? Or
am I missing something?
> The above was just an example how cumbersome things can get if your
> 'int_t<N>' is spelled 'let_value_be<int,N>'. This does matter - consider,
> for example, creating a heterogeneous list of int_t's and "ordinary" types.
Yes let_value_be<int,N> is very long winded in the case that you only
want ints in the list. I think int_t is crying out for templated
typedef though (otherwise it will not be the same thing).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk