From: James S. Adelman (j.adelman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-27 12:39:35
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 4:52 pm, you wrote:
> From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> > Finally, I like the int2type<> and type2type<> names. They are
> > obvious to me. I don't see a need to change them into *_identity.
> You know, after all the tossing around, I would love to return to them,
> too. Besides, they are known because of Mc++D and articles.
Yes: they are aliases, not identities; we have strong typing, after all.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk