Re: [boost] Submission: typelist

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-28 09:06:38

Actually, the  type list implementation in MPL isn't the (most) interesting
part. The algorithms are more interesting, IMO.

-Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rodgers" <mark.rodgers_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Submission: typelist

> From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
> > Another prefatory remark, not too jokey this time, is that typelists are
> > essential to a very large subset of Loki. As I mentioned in another
post,
> > typelists are used in Factory, Functor, Tuple, Visitor,
DoubleDispatcher,
> > and the two hierarchy generators. In the future I'm sure Observer,
> > Composite, and other generic components I work on will use typelists as
> > well. That's why I started by submitting typelists to boost as part of
my
> > plan of submitting the whole Loki to boost.
>
> You need to have some sort of type list available - does it need to be
> Loki's?  Is there any good reason why you could not submit a version of
> Loki that is build on top of MPL's type lists?  Does it matter to Factory,
> etc how the type list is implemented?
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Unsubscribe:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>