From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-28 09:06:38
Actually, the type list implementation in MPL isn't the (most) interesting
part. The algorithms are more interesting, IMO.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rodgers" <mark.rodgers_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Submission: typelist
> From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
> > Another prefatory remark, not too jokey this time, is that typelists are
> > essential to a very large subset of Loki. As I mentioned in another
> > typelists are used in Factory, Functor, Tuple, Visitor,
> > and the two hierarchy generators. In the future I'm sure Observer,
> > Composite, and other generic components I work on will use typelists as
> > well. That's why I started by submitting typelists to boost as part of
> > plan of submitting the whole Loki to boost.
> You need to have some sort of type list available - does it need to be
> Loki's? Is there any good reason why you could not submit a version of
> Loki that is build on top of MPL's type lists? Does it matter to Factory,
> etc how the type list is implemented?
> Info: http://www.boost.org Unsubscribe:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk