|
Boost : |
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-28 11:45:55
David Abrahams wrote:
> > If Andrei were to rework his type list submission so that
> > it matched the mpl interface, we could get it accepted
> > earlier than mpl and people could begin to use it. We
> > could then go on to debate the merits of the rest of
> > the mpl and the alternative implementation without worrying
> > that we'd already accepted a completely different and
> > incompatible type list.
>
> It's not a bad idea, but mpl has some specific idioms which need some
> examination. For example, in mpl, a metafunction is spelled this way:
>
> struct function
> {
> template <class T, ...>
> struct apply
> {
> typedef ... type;
> static ... const value = ...;
> };
> };
Well, Loki doesn't have algorithms that take meta-functions, so we are safe
to debate it in a length without affecting any dates :).
Aleksey
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk